當(dāng)前位置:財富500強首頁 > 母線槽 > 新聞?wù)?/div>

分析母線槽與電纜的利弊

來源于本站原創(chuàng) 2023年07月19日 閱讀(

現(xiàn)代高層建筑和大型車間需要巨大的電能,面對這龐大的負荷所需的強大電流必須選用安全可靠的輸變電設(shè)備,母線槽將是最理想的選擇,母線槽的輸變電優(yōu)越性是普通電力電纜無法比較和超越的。母線槽系統(tǒng)是一個高效輸變電裝置,尤其適應(yīng)高層建筑物和大規(guī)模工廠經(jīng)濟合理配線的需要。

Modern high-rise buildings and large workshops need huge electric energy. In the face of this huge load, the strong current required must select safe and reliable power transmission and transformation equipment. Busduct will be the most ideal choice. The power transmission and transformation advantages of Busduct are incomparable and beyond ordinary power cables. The Busduct system is an efficient power transmission and transformation device, especially suitable for the economic and reasonable wiring needs of high-rise building and large-scale factories.

高層建筑和大型廠房大電流輸配電時,若選用電力電纜這需要多增加許多無形的成本,比如車間輸配電時每個設(shè)備、回路都要重復(fù)敷設(shè)控制電纜,而且電纜的安全控制起點只能在配電柜內(nèi),若發(fā)生緊急狀況時無法立即切斷電源而造成巨大安全風(fēng)險和財產(chǎn)損失,特別是大型車間工程若使用電力電纜則必須和高強度的橋架、高密度支架及若干固定支架等一起使用,大大增加人工、輔材、機具的經(jīng)濟成本、維護成本,延誤工期,降低工作效率。

When using power cables for high current transmission and distribution in high-rise buildings and large factories, there are many intangible costs that need to be added. For example, during workshop transmission and distribution, each equipment and circuit needs to repeatedly lay control cables, and the safety control starting point of the cables can only be inside the distribution switchboard. If an emergency situation occurs and the power cannot be immediately cut off, it will cause huge safety risks and property losses, Especially in large-scale workshop projects, if power cables are used, they must be used together with high-strength bridges, high-density supports, and several fixed supports, greatly increasing the economic and maintenance costs of labor, auxiliary materials, and machinery, delaying the construction period, and reducing work efficiency.

高層建筑和大型廠房使用電力電纜浪費嚴重,增加故障隱患,比如車間供電需要10000米和母線槽等截面電力電纜時,如果選用封閉母線槽最多只要8000~9000米,因為電纜預(yù)算、采購、施工時損耗大,難保管,難庫存、難運輸,而采用等截面母線槽施工時基本是零損耗,而且母線槽廠家技術(shù)人員會積極參與、協(xié)助現(xiàn)場,優(yōu)化現(xiàn)場設(shè)計,無償提供全程技術(shù)服務(wù),大大降低用戶的使用成本,讓用戶省事省力省心。

The use of power cables in high-rise buildings and large plants is a serious waste, which increases the hidden trouble. For example, when 10000 meters and Busduct equivalent cross-section power cables are required for power supply in workshops, if the enclosed Busduct is selected, it is only 8000~9000 meters at most. Because of the large loss in cable budget, procurement, and construction, it is difficult to keep, store, and transport the cables, while the construction of Bus duct with equal cross-section is basically zero loss, Moreover, the technicians of the Busduct manufacturer will actively participate in and assist the site, optimize the site design, and provide full technical services free of charge, which will greatly reduce the customer’s use cost and save the time and effort.

從母線槽與電纜性能對比來看,母線槽方案完全優(yōu)于電纜方案,電纜在施工過程中周期較長,后期維護非常困難,異常情況排查困難,無法得以檢測。母線槽的方案,在施工階段快束,安裝簡單、安全、可靠。另外可實現(xiàn)溫度集中監(jiān)控,可有效預(yù)防設(shè)備用電異常。從項目投入資金使用狀況來看,銅母線最多,電纜次之,鋁母線較低。從母線槽與電纜在投入使用后,電能的損耗曲線來看,電纜運營過程中的電纜損耗幅度最大,而母線槽方案,雖然在項目初期投入稍大,但是在后期運行之后,電纜每年的電損相比母線槽多很多。

From the comparison of Busduct and cable performance, the Busduct scheme is completely superior to the cable scheme. The cable has a long construction period, which is very difficult to maintain in the later stage, and it is difficult to check the abnormal conditions, which cannot be detected. The scheme of Busduct is fast in the construction phase, and the installation is simple, safe and reliable. In addition, centralized temperature monitoring can be achieved, which can effectively prevent abnormal equipment electricity usage. From the perspective of project investment and utilization, copper busduct is the most common, followed by cables, and aluminum busduct is the lowest. From the power loss curve of Busduct and cable after they are put into use, the cable loss is the largest in the cable operation process. Although the Busduct scheme is slightly larger in the initial stage of the project, after the later operation, the annual power loss of cable is much more than that of Busduct.


免責(zé)聲明:此文內(nèi)容為本網(wǎng)站轉(zhuǎn)載企業(yè)宣傳資訊,僅代表作者個人觀點,與本網(wǎng)無關(guān)。文中內(nèi)容僅供讀者參考,并請自行核實相關(guān)內(nèi)容。如用戶將之作為消費行為參考,本網(wǎng)敬告用戶需審慎決定。本網(wǎng)不承擔(dān)任何經(jīng)濟和法律責(zé)任。